{"id":3391,"date":"2015-07-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-07-13T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/blog\/cw_post\/three-factors-for-success-agency-integrated-identity-and-competencies\/"},"modified":"2020-02-05T12:55:24","modified_gmt":"2020-02-05T17:55:24","slug":"three-factors-for-success-agency-integrated-identity-and-competencies","status":"publish","type":"cw_post","link":"https:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/cw_post\/three-factors-for-success-agency-integrated-identity-and-competencies\/","title":{"rendered":"Three Factors for Success: Agency, Integrated Identity, and Competencies"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"yd\"<\/a>There is growing interest \u2013\u00a0and I would also argue growing confusion\u00a0\u2013 about all the skills and dispositions that aren\u2019t academic content areas. They are often lumped together under the phrase \u201cnon-cognitive.” I fully agree with Andy Calkins<\/a> that the term \u201cnon-cognitive\u201d is problematic. In fact, I would say it is downright silly and makes us sound like we don\u2019t know anything about learning and brain science when we suggest higher order thinking skills are not part of a cognitive process.<\/p>\n

However, I don\u2019t think the answer is in finding the right terminology, but in understanding how all these skills and dispositions relate to learning and to the development of young people into what we have called college and career ready. There is significant difference between dispositions such as grit or perseverance and skills related to self-knowledge such as self-control, not to mention skills used in projects and work such as collaboration and communication, and thinking skills such as analysis or evaluation used in almost every academic pursuit. I\u2019m not quite sure where creativity goes at all …perhaps it is a category unto itself.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s important to understand these differences and think carefully about how they are nurtured, what they look like developmentally that might be structured as benchmarks, and how they are assessed. Don\u2019t get me wrong \u2013\u00a0I\u2019m not advocating for formal summative assessments. It doesn\u2019t make sense to me to try to have NAEP monitoring grit<\/a> at this point in time unless we really understand how all these dispositions and skills fit together. And until we determine which ones, if any,\u00a0\u00a0are important to measure. It\u2019s much more important for us to figure out how schools and teachers, working with community partners, develop and assess as a cycle of learning and development.<\/p>\n

The University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research<\/a> has just released an absolutely groundbreaking developmental framework that could help us on our way of understanding how these concept fit together. The report, Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework<\/a><\/em>,\u00a0provides a two-tier framework (captured in this infographic<\/a>). The authors propose that young adults will be successful when three key factors are in place: agency, integrated identity, and competencies. According to the report, \u201cThese factors capture how a young adult poised for success interacts with the world (agency), the internal compass that a young adult uses to make decisions consistent with her values, beliefs, and goals (an integrated identity), and how she is able to be effective in different tasks (competencies).\u201d Underlying the key factors are four foundational components: self-regulation, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and values.<\/p>\n

The authors define these factors as:<\/p>\n

Agency<\/b> is the ability to make choices about and take an active role in one\u2019s life path, rather than solely being the product of one\u2019s circumstances. Agency requires the intentionality and forethought to derive a course of action and adjust that course as needed to reflect one\u2019s identity, competencies, knowledge and skills, mindsets, and values.<\/p>\n

Integrated Identity<\/b> is a sense of internal consistency about who one is across time and across multiple social identities (e.g., race\/ethnicity, profession, culture, gender, religion). An integrated identity serves as an internal framework for making choices and provides a stable base from which one can act in the world.<\/p>\n

Competencies<\/b> are the abilities that enable people to effectively perform roles, complete complex tasks, or achieve specific objectives. Successful young adults have sets of competencies (e.g., critical thinking, responsible decision-making, ability to collaborate) that allow them to be productive and engaged, navigate across contexts, perform effectively in different settings, and adapt to different task and setting demands.<\/p>\n

The definition of competencies may cause us some trouble, as states and districts are creating the academic competencies (whereas the authors of the report would call these foundational knowledge and skills). However, I think there is something helpful in identifying academics as \u201cknowledge\u201d and the thinking and applying skills as \u201ccompetencies.” What\u2019s important is to remember that students need both knowledge and competencies\u00a0\u2013 one without the other doesn\u2019t get you far.<\/p>\n

There is a lot of potential in establishing \u201cagency\u201d as a key factor. All those areas related to character, disposition, and self-management can be included here, as they are all related to students being able to manage themselves, their learning, and how they interact with their environments.<\/p>\n

The authors also emphasize that we need to think of these factors in terms of developmental stages, something that has rarely been done in the world of \u201cnon-cogs\u201d or social-emotional learning. They break it into five stages with developmental tasks for each:<\/p>\n