{"id":4087,"date":"2016-08-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2016-08-05T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/blog\/cw_post\/engaging-others-a-short-reflection-on-leadership\/"},"modified":"2020-02-05T12:59:18","modified_gmt":"2020-02-05T17:59:18","slug":"engaging-others-a-short-reflection-on-leadership","status":"publish","type":"cw_post","link":"https:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/cw_post\/engaging-others-a-short-reflection-on-leadership\/","title":{"rendered":"Engaging Others: A Short Reflection on Leadership"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Conversation\"I\u2019ve been thinking about leadership a lot recently. Just about every technical assistant provider and intermediary I speak with refers to two challenges they face working with districts: lack of capacity and lack of leadership. The former is a phrase so general it lacks meaning except to reinforce the existence for the TA provider. We know that implementing competency education puts everyone outside their comfort zone to some degree. We know that everyone is climbing steep learning trajectories to build out the skills to better meet student needs. The phrase lack of capacity echoes a fixed mindset \u2013 as if people do not have the capacity to learn rather than a need to build specific knowledge or skills.<\/p>\n

The latter issue is problematic as well. First, it is difficult to separate a leader from leadership skills. Obviously positional roles such as school board, superintendent, and principal means that there are leaders in districts in schools. So this must be referring to leadership skills. Second, it is not clear if it is inadequate leadership skills or the wrong type of skills.<\/p>\n