(based on CASEL), to help students build their executive functioning skills. There is a focus on intellectual growth, personal responsibility, and social growth. Consistent with standards-based grading practices, they\u2019ve separated out the HOLLs from scoring on academic progress in their grading system (JumpRope). <\/span><\/p>\nLindblom realized that they need to strengthen their support to students around HOLLs. Bevis explained, \u201cThe year before we converted, we made sure there was vertical alignment in the academic standards. The habits took less priority, and now we realize how important they are. Looking back, I would consider developing HOLLs and vertical academic alignment simultaneously.\u201d Lindblom is now investing in building their capacity to support the development of HOLLs. In a partnership with Rush Neurological Center, they have trained thirty staff on executive functioning and brain science. They have also organized classes<\/span> on executive functioning for seventh and ninth graders.<\/span><\/p>\nThey\u2019ve also learned that scoring HOLLS in a similar way to academics (monitor and scoring) isn\u2019t as effective as using it as a way to construct conversations at the end of each quarter. Teachers are using it as a way to engage students in self-assessments and self-reflection. In fact, teachers increasingly prefer to use a bi-model \u201cmeeting\u201d or \u201cnot yet meeting\u201d in scoring HOLLS, as they find it difficult to distinguish between a 2 and 3. At the parent conferences, students reflect on how they are doing in developing HOLLs. Bevis said that parents are confirming the value of HOLLs in making much more valuable conversations with their children and teachers. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe team at Lindblom have decided not to attach the HOLLs to athletic eligibility or other opportunities. Bevis explained that they are designed to build intrinsic motivation, and using them for extrinsic rewards (or punishment) actually undermines the strategy.<\/span><\/p>\nHighlights of School Design<\/h3>\n Each week there is a colloquium day with an advisory (students stay with the same advisor<\/span> through high school), three flex classes, and a colloquium. Based on information in JumpRope, students get a weekly email telling them where they need to focus. Students then determine where they need to go during each of the flex classes to get more help or work on tasks. Bevis emphasized, \u201cSometimes they just need work time, and sometimes they need specific support.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\nThe colloquium is an enrichment course such as American Sign Language, culinary science, archery, hands-on biology with a representative from the Chicago Parks, or tutoring in neighboring elementary schools.<\/span><\/p>\nAt the Academic Center, middle school students can work at grade level as well as earn high school credit. The seventh graders are in a \u201chouse\u201d with the same group of teachers who work with them through eighth grade to create stronger relationships and establish more accountability. Please note: CPS allows students who are on a high school campus to earn high school credit. Other middle schools aren\u2019t allowed to provide high school credit. Obviously, that\u2019s a policy that will need to be changed if CPS decides it wants to open the door to more competency-based schools. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nWhat Do Students Have to Say About PBL?<\/h3>\n Staying On Track<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n One student said that PBL sounds great in theory, but in practice, \u201cit\u2019s a lot scarier. It feels strict because the expectations are that everyone learns.\u201d She agrees that the ability to revise is what really makes the difference. But there is a downside for her: \u201cI feel like I have to attack revisions immediately. It feels like pressure because you can slip behind pretty quickly.\u201d I asked if she felt like she had enough support. She was enthusiastic. \u201cMy teachers are really supportive and are willing to tutor me. My teachers are the reason I\u2019m doing my best my best to not fall behind. They give me every opportunity to get help and get more time. They help me figure out how to get all everything done.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\nAnother student explained that he prefers the PBL system to the old grading system. \u201cIt shows our growth,\u201d he said. \u201cIt feels like the grading system likes you and believes in you.\u201d He also was very appreciative of the Lindblom teachers. \u201cThey are not like any other teachers I\u2019ve ever had. They want to make sure you understand and they want to keep you on track. They ask me to revise until they are sure I understand.\u201d \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe Trouble with the Power Law<\/h3>\n High schools, more than any other type of school, have pressure to convert standards-based grading into numbers that can generate a GPA. JumpRope\u2019s grading system provides options for how this is done. Lindblom had selected the\u00a0<\/span>Power Law<\/span><\/a>, but found it too problematic to continue using. They changed to Decaying Average in the middle of the year. <\/span><\/p>\nOne teacher explained, \u201cWith the Power Law, it was difficult to explain to a mother why a student has 3s and 4s on everything except for one test in history and then the progress report shows a 2.\u201d Essentially no one understood the algorithm used \u2013 this creates mistrust and frustration. Students who are motivated by getting the highest GPAs feel disadvantaged by not understanding the rules of the game. Bevis explained, \u201cWe’ve reverted back to Decaying Average due to the opaqueness of Power Law. Parent\/Student surveys clearly showed a preference for the transparency and predictability of Decaying Average.\u201d He added, \u201cEven our math teachers couldn\u2019t figure out how it works and incorporates trends. We\u2019ve made the agreement that we don\u2019t use grading systems if we can\u2019t explain them.\u201d No grading system is perfect: Feedback from teachers, students, and and parents is that there is too much weight on last assignment in the Decaying Average. <\/span><\/p>\nWhat\u2019s Next<\/h3>\n The next steps at Lindblom are learner profiles and building a competency-based transcript. They are interested in creating tools that provide more opportunities for students to take ownership and monitor their own learning. They are also considering creating a diploma with distinction for students who demonstrate more skills and meeting additional sets of standards.<\/span><\/p>\nEntire\u00a0Series:<\/strong><\/p>\nPart 1 \u2013\u00a0CBE in Chicago<\/a><\/p>\nPart 2 \u2013\u00a0Leap Innovations \u2013 Learning Exponentially for Advancing Potential<\/a><\/p>\nPart 3 –\u00a0Loving Learning at Lovett Elementary<\/a><\/p>\nPart 4 –\u00a0Personalizing Learning at West Belden<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","mapsvg_location":""},"legacy_category":[],"issue":[368,371],"location":[119],"class_list":["post-4433","cw_post","type-cw_post","status-publish","hentry","issue-issues-in-practice","issue-learn-lessons-from-the-field","location-illinois"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nGetting Results at Lindblom - Aurora Institute<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n