{"id":4487,"date":"2017-06-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-06-08T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/blog\/cw_post\/introducing-an-equity-framework-for-competency-education\/"},"modified":"2020-02-05T13:02:10","modified_gmt":"2020-02-05T18:02:10","slug":"introducing-an-equity-framework-for-competency-education","status":"publish","type":"cw_post","link":"https:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/cw_post\/introducing-an-equity-framework-for-competency-education\/","title":{"rendered":"Introducing an Equity Framework for Competency Education"},"content":{"rendered":"
This is the second blog in a series leading up to the <\/span><\/i>National Summit on K-12 Competency-Based Education<\/span><\/i><\/a>. We are focusing on four key areas: equity, quality, meeting students where they are, and policy. (Learn more about the Summit <\/span><\/i>here<\/span><\/i><\/a>.) We released a series of draft papers in early June to begin addressing these issues. This article is adapted from <\/span><\/i>In Pursuit of Equality: A Framework for Equity Strategies in Competency-Based Education.<\/span><\/a> It is important to remember that all of these ideas can be further developed, revised, or combined \u2013\u00a0the papers are only a starting point for introducing these key issues and driving discussions at the Summit. We would love to hear your comments on which ideas are strong, which are wrong, and how we might be able to advance the field. <\/span><\/i><\/p>\n One of our challenges at the <\/span>National Summit on K-12 Competency-Based Education<\/span><\/a> is to explore, clarify, and develop recommendations on how to approach and improve equity within a competency-based system. In a competency-based system we assume that there is some level of personalization and differentiation in order to meet students where they are, to build lifelong learning skills, and to engage and motivate students. In the participatory Technical Advisory Group we looked at several driving questions, including:<\/span><\/p>\n The first step was to clarify what we meant by equity. With a reflection on how the concept of fairness or equality has developed in American education, we came to an understanding that <\/span>equity refers to the strategies \u2013<\/span><\/i>\u00a0equity strategies if you will \u2013\u00a0that are used to ensure that all students succeed. After looking at many definitions, we are building upon the definition of equity advanced by the <\/span>National Equity Project<\/span><\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n Educational equity means that each child receives what he or she needs to develop to his or her full academic and social potential. Working toward equity in schools involves:<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n However, we hold out as an aspirational goal the vision of educational <\/span>equality<\/span><\/i> in which all students thrive and develop to their fullest potential. Potential is something difficult to measure and thus susceptible to bias and institutional patterns that treat students differently based on color of skin, earnings and education of parents, language used in the home, and learning challenges. Thus, we are staying focused on the idea of college and career readiness as the goal with the expectation that we will more fully define those skills as the new definition of success in school. <\/span><\/p>\n At the <\/span>National Summit<\/span><\/a>, we will propose and strengthen an equity framework for personalized, competency-based education that includes a set of guiding principles for ensuring that competency-based education is fully designed to support equity strategies and ensure all students are growing and progressing. We organized our thinking into eight categories, each with guiding principles: culture of safety, respect and trust; student agency; transparency; new definition of success that informs graduation outcomes; pedagogical philosophy; responsiveness, continuous improvement, and success; consistency and reliability; and, \u00a0progress, proficiency, pace, and school\/district performance. <\/span><\/p>\n We invite you to share your insights and feedback to the proposed guiding principles below. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n 1. Culture of Safety, Respect, and Trust: <\/b>The culture of schools are designed so that all students and adults, especially the most marginalized, feel safe and respected and can build trusting relationships that enable direct and productive feedback.<\/p>\n Proposed Guiding Principles<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n 2. Student Agency:<\/b> Schools provide feedback, coaching, and opportunities for students to build the skills and mindsets needed to take ownership of their learning and become lifelong learners.<\/span><\/p>\n Proposed Guiding Principles<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n 3. Transparency: <\/b>The cycle of learning is explicit and transparent so that students know what they need to learn, what proficiency looks like, how they will be assessed, and how they are progressing.<\/p>\n Proposed Guiding Principles<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n 4. New Definition of Success that Informs Graduation Outcomes:<\/b> Districts and schools engage the community in creating a shared vision of what students need to know and be able to do upon graduation. Districts and schools are designed around a well-rounded set of graduation outcomes including lifelong learning, higher order skills, and academic skills and content.<\/p>\n Proposed Guiding Principles<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n 5. Pedagogical Philosophy: <\/b>Districts and schools are designed around shared and explicit pedagogical philosophies based on research in engagement, motivation, child\/youth development, and learning sciences.<\/p>\n Proposed Guiding Principles<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n 6. Responsiveness, Continuous Improvement, and Success:<\/b> Districts and schools use data on student progress to create agile organizations that can respond to student needs, drive continuous improvement, and ensure that students are successfully reaching proficiency each step of the way.<\/p>\n Proposed Guiding Principles<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n 7. Consistency and Reliability: <\/b>The expectations of the learning objectives and rigor are calibrated with all students being held to the same high standards, including demonstrating mastery and fluency in the foundational skills.<\/span><\/p>\n Proposed Guiding Principles<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n 8. Progress, Proficiency, Pace, and School\/District Performance:<\/b> Student progress is measured by growth along a learning continuum with personalized strategies for setting the pace of learning towards graduation.<\/span><\/p>\n Proposed Guiding Principles<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n By creating a framework, we as a field have a place to collect and share our knowledge about how to improve equity in personalized, competency-based systems. We invite you to share your reactions to these guiding principles, and we encourage you to share next steps that can be taken to transform these principles into action. <\/span><\/p>\n It is very much up to the adults in the system, from teachers to federal policymakers, to take responsibility to learn as much as we can about improving equity and holding ourselves accountable for putting it into action. We must live and breathe equity in our daily lives.<\/span><\/p>\n Follow this blog series:<\/b><\/p>\n Learn more: <\/b><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n