{"id":4918,"date":"2018-05-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-05-22T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/blog\/cw_post\/competency-frameworks\/"},"modified":"2020-02-05T13:05:28","modified_gmt":"2020-02-05T18:05:28","slug":"competency-frameworks","status":"publish","type":"cw_post","link":"https:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/cw_post\/competency-frameworks\/","title":{"rendered":"Competency Frameworks"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
At one point in my journey of understanding about competency-based education, I questioned whether we really needed competencies. Wasn\u2019t it okay just to have standards? Paul Leather helped me understand the value of competencies by asking What would the system look like if we had a blank slate? Would we really want standards to be the defining way to think about expectations for students?<\/em><\/p>\n Thus, it became clear to me that we definitely do want to use competencies as a high level organizing structure that can be used to determine if students really are building the skills they need for life. It pushes us to include competencies beyond academic domains that we know are important for transferring knowledge and for lifelong learning. It also pushes us toward deeper learning.<\/p>\n However, it does still seem absolutely fine for districts and schools to start the transition to competency-based education using standards (as District 51<\/a> has done) with the assumption that over time folks will want to take a step back and think about the competencies they want to include in their graduate profile.<\/p>\n I\u2019ve started to collect some different examples of competencies (based on who has made them available on the web). They vary in terms of how much attention there is to academic domains as well as the cross-curricular competencies that are related to transferable skills and lifelong learning. They vary in how much they focus on competencies or making meaning out of the standards. And they vary in how much they approach students wholistically.<\/p>\n A competency (1) is structured as a grouping of related skills (2) that cumulatively serve as a measure of a learner\u2019s level of\u00a0competence. Performance level descriptors (3) along a continuum help describe how each skill becomes more sophisticated as it develops\u00a0toward mastery (4). Based on our\u00a0most recent analysis,\u00a0Level 10 represents \u201ccollege ready\u201d work and \u201cLevel 12\u201d on our continuum represents \u201ccollege-level\u201d work.<\/em><\/p>\n I love this distinction of college-ready and college-level work. I definitely think that the last two years of high school need to include making sure students can actually do college level work. This idea of graduating and then taking remediation has just got to go.<\/p>\n Redesign<\/a> has a Competency Adoption Guide<\/a> that can help you make sense of the process. Rose Colby\u2019s book Competency-Based Education: A New Architecture for K-12 Schooling<\/a> has a chapter that walks you through a process as well.<\/p>\n Do you have a set of competencies that you would like to share? Please send them to me at chris (at) metisnet (dot) net. We\u2019d love to make a range of examples accessible so that districts and schools can get a sense of the landscape before designing their own.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","mapsvg_location":""},"legacy_category":[],"issue":[368,371],"location":[],"class_list":["post-4918","cw_post","type-cw_post","status-publish","hentry","issue-issues-in-practice","issue-learn-lessons-from-the-field"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n
\n
\n