{"id":5804,"date":"2012-05-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2012-05-14T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/blog\/cw_post\/autonomy-apples-and-oranges\/"},"modified":"2020-02-05T12:48:20","modified_gmt":"2020-02-05T17:48:20","slug":"autonomy-apples-and-oranges","status":"publish","type":"cw_post","link":"https:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/cw_post\/autonomy-apples-and-oranges\/","title":{"rendered":"Autonomy, Apples, and Oranges"},"content":{"rendered":"
What have you learned about how to work with districts in introducing competency-based schools–and what district leaders can do?<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n I have been working since 1985 on competency-based education (CBE) models to better serve over-aged and under-credited\u00a0 students, first as the Education Director of Jobs for Youth High and later as the founder of Diploma Plus<\/a> and more recently Schools for the Future<\/a>.<\/p>\n The following lessons learned for how to establish strong working relationships with districts are generalized for CBE.\u00a0 (Click here for a checklist<\/a>) However, anyone working with marginalized students, especially those that are over-age and undercredited, will need to negotiate upfront the expectations of the population you want to serve and how students will gain admission to the school (first come; lottery, application; placement).<\/p>\n 1) Negotiating the Time-Based Constraints<\/strong><\/p>\n 2)\u00a0 Have An Aggressive Focus on Students and Learning<\/strong><\/p>\n Autonomy, Apples and Oranges<\/strong><\/p>\n This last point is arguably the key.\u00a0 At the very heart of CBE is the proposition that: (1) the learning target (typically a set of proof points that show students are ready for success after high school) are fixed but, (2) \u00a0the route that students take to get there varies by need\u2014sometimes student by student. (Click here to find School for the Future’s Three Big Principles<\/a>)<\/p>\n Attempts to make the \u201chow\u201d uniform for all (students scoring at level 1 must take six months of developmental reading for 240 minutes per week) destroys the very essence of CBE.\u00a0 If we want students to advance based on demonstrated competence we cannot mix in non-competency-based indicators such as fixed time or the same curriculum for everyone.<\/p>\n Conclusion<\/strong>: It is very hard for schools not to fall into the traditional ways of doing things. Like all of us, they know what they know and they don\u2019t have a mental model for CBE.\u00a0 While you don\u2019t need districts to have every policy in place to support CBE, if you don\u2019t have most of them you will likely have a hard time succeeding.<\/p>\n __________About the Author__________<\/strong><\/p>\n Ephraim Weisstein is founder of\u00a0 Schools for the Future. Previously, Ephraim Weisstein was a co-designer of Diploma Plus, a nationally acclaimed alternative high school model operating 30 schools in eight states and serving 4,000 formerly disconnected youth. You can reach Ephraim at\u00a0eweisstein@schools4future.org<\/em><\/p>\n ____________________________________<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n