{"id":6587,"date":"2015-05-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-05-26T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/blog\/cw_post\/moving-past-summative-vs-formative-assessments\/"},"modified":"2020-02-27T14:46:57","modified_gmt":"2020-02-27T19:46:57","slug":"moving-past-summative-vs-formative-assessments","status":"publish","type":"cw_post","link":"https:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/cw_post\/moving-past-summative-vs-formative-assessments\/","title":{"rendered":"Moving Past Summative vs. Formative Assessments"},"content":{"rendered":"
As competency-based education (CBE) gains momentum in higher education, the market is becoming increasingly crowded with companies and institutions working on competency-based platforms and online approaches to CBE.<\/p>\n
One of the challenges with online CBE, however, is that there is such an intense focus on building from scratch or building in-house that most of an organization\u2019s energy and resources are channeled into the platform and the intricate backward mapping and breakdown of competencies. In addition, in having to consider a multitude of ancillary issues such as integrating adaptive learning technologies, creating e-portfolios, building repositories of content, and reimagining staffing models, many learning providers find themselves dealing with assessments as more of an afterthought.<\/p>\n
But assessments are the crux of a competency-based approach. Neglecting them misses dialing in on one of the things that is so critical to CBE being transformational, robust, and rigorous: how do we know if and when a student has achieved proficiency, fluency, and mastery of a competency?<\/p>\n
In missing this, too often providers fall back on a familiar pattern by merely focusing on the summative assessments at the end of a course of study rather than valid assessments that are deployed rapidly and frequently throughout.<\/p>\n
But this isn\u2019t simply a matter of focusing on formative assessments instead of summative. Indeed, many in the field are missing the opportunity to blow past the familiar categorization scheme of summative vs. formative assessments and move to a world in which assessments are both for <\/i>learning\u2014to drive what a student does next\u2014as well as of <\/i>learning\u2014and thus have stakes attached to them, in the sense that students move on only upon mastery.<\/p>\n
A story that we\u2019ve told before bears repeating, as it helps illustrate why this is possible in a competency-based world where time becomes a variable and learning for all students is a constant\u2014in other words, failure is no longer an option.<\/p>\n