{"id":7087,"date":"2016-12-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2016-12-07T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/blog\/cw_post\/pacing-in-competency-based-learning\/"},"modified":"2020-02-27T14:47:29","modified_gmt":"2020-02-27T19:47:29","slug":"pacing-in-competency-based-learning","status":"publish","type":"cw_post","link":"https:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/cw_post\/pacing-in-competency-based-learning\/","title":{"rendered":"Pacing in Competency-Based Learning"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"pacing\"This post originally appeared at Getting Smart<\/a> on November 23, 2016.<\/em><\/p>\n

In a recent school design workshop, a school leader asked, \u201cHow do we avoid students racing through the system at the expense of depth?\u201d<\/p>\n

To make this more challenging, she added, \u201cHow do we avoid encouraging parents to compete\/brag on progress (e.g., my son is 1.5 years ahead of his age group)?\u201d<\/p>\n

No drag racing.<\/strong> Learning isn\u2019t a drag race, but we may inadvertently set up rules that suggest otherwise. Most of us have seen well-intentioned credit recovery courses that were nothing more than clicking through online content and assessments. It may help students quickly earn credits, but it rewards low-level engagement and recall.<\/p>\n

To avoid racing it\u2019s important to measure what matters<\/a>: if you want depth, assessments should value it. As NGLC MyWays<\/a>\u00a0suggests, it is important to measure creativity, critical thinking, entrepreneurship, collaboration and social skills. As Buck suggests<\/a>, requiring key success skills, sustained inquiry and a public product contributes to deeper learning. The iNACOL definition recommends<\/a>:<\/p>\n