{"id":12852,"date":"2020-06-09T15:19:15","date_gmt":"2020-06-09T19:19:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/?p=12852"},"modified":"2020-06-09T15:19:15","modified_gmt":"2020-06-09T19:19:15","slug":"the-opportunity-for-a-california-profile-of-a-graduate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/blog\/the-opportunity-for-a-california-profile-of-a-graduate\/","title":{"rendered":"The Opportunity for a California Profile of a Graduate"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
This post was originally published<\/a> by Scaling Student Success on June 1, 2020.<\/em><\/p>\n What does it mean for young people to be prepared for future success? Are the competencies, skills, and mindsets universal, or do they vary from community to community, state to state, and country to country? How can we anticipate the needs in a world that is so unpredictable, as we have learned over the past few months? Even if we are not confident in our ability to predict the future, can we still rely on the most current research to identify the skills most likely to catapult our young people confidently into their futures?<\/p>\n Several states have been proactive in answering these questions. They have named the competencies that they believe represent what young people will need to succeed in college, career, and civic life. According to a\u00a02014 report<\/a>\u00a0by American Institutes for Research (AIR), 35 states and the District of Columbia had defined college and career readiness. Some have gone further and created a Graduate Profile \u2013 see examples from\u00a0Virginia<\/a>,\u00a0South Carolina<\/a>, and\u00a0New Mexico<\/a>. These states articulate a broader definition of student success because they believe that, while the Common Core Standards, Next Generation Science Standards, and the associated assessments build a necessary foundation for college and career readiness, the academic core, in and of itself, is not sufficient to holistically and equitably prepare all young people for future success.<\/p>\n Several leading organizations have pushed for states and communities to develop a Graduate Profile. For the past decade,\u00a0ConnectED: The National Center for College and Career<\/a>, has promoted Graduate Profile development for school districts and communities in which they support the rollout of Linked Learning pathways. In recent years, through its Portrait of a Graduate initiative,\u00a0Battelle for Kids<\/a>\u00a0has encouraged districts to move in this direction. Now, many other non-profit support providers and for-profit consulting groups actively endorse this national trend. And recently, the Aurora Institute (formerly iNACOL) published a\u00a0policy brief<\/a>, in which they identified the top issues to address in state policy for transforming our K-12 education system. The #1 recommendation (of 11) calls for defining \u201cstudent success through a\u00a0Profile of a Graduate<\/a>\u00a0to create a vision to modernize and redefine more holistic graduation requirements based on what students need to know and be able to do for future success.\u201d<\/p>\n California is the largest and most diverse state in the nation. That alone makes defining student success and\/or creating a Graduate Profile a daunting challenge. That said, back in 2012, when ConnectED was serving as a California hub for promoting college and career pathways, they partnered with\u00a0WestEd<\/a>\u00a0to do a field analysis and draft a research-based report, called \u201cCollege and Career Readiness: What Does It Mean?<\/a>\u201d That was a good start, and since then the State Board has done much to better incorporate measures of college and career readiness into the state\u2019s reporting system. Moving forward, the state of California could blend prior efforts and create an updated definition.<\/p>\n But, there is another, perhaps better, option \u2014 one that values and leverages the experiences of local school districts. Lacking a state definition for college-, career-, and civic-readiness, a growing number of CA school districts have engaged their local communities to create their own Graduate Profiles to more broadly define student success based on their local values, priorities, and circumstances. A new CA partnership, called\u00a0Scaling Student Success<\/a>, has formed a community of practice among those school districts. Rather than just hanging their Graduate Profiles on the walls as aspirational posters, Scaling Student Success districts are fully committed to moving \u201cfrom poster to practice\u201d \u2013 i.e., fully operationalizing the Profiles in a way that holds the district and community collectively accountable for ensuring that each and every student has an equitable opportunity to develop and demonstrate the competencies articulated on the Graduate Profile.<\/p>\n In 2013-14, California enacted the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), funding schools based on need and prioritizing local control as a driving force for continuous improvement and accountability. Local control has been embraced by the State Board of Education, Department of Education, and local school boards. As a grassroots approach that honors the spirit of LCFF, state leaders could (1) gather Graduate Profiles from districts around the state, (2) complete an analysis of common features, and (3) use those cross-district, cross-community results to inform a statewide definition of the future-ready student and\/or create a CA Graduate Profile that would incentivize local efforts.<\/p>\n
\nCollege and Career Readiness Defined<\/h3>\n
California’s Opportunity<\/h3>\n
An Innovative Approach<\/h3>\n