{"id":2287,"date":"2017-08-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-08-14T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/blog\/nine-structural-domains-of-competency-education-part-ii\/"},"modified":"2019-12-16T12:55:47","modified_gmt":"2019-12-16T17:55:47","slug":"nine-structural-domains-of-competency-education-part-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/blog\/nine-structural-domains-of-competency-education-part-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"Nine Structural Domains of Competency Education, Part II"},"content":{"rendered":"
This post first appeared on CompetencyWorks<\/a> on June 14, 2017.<\/em><\/p>\n <\/a>This is the ninth blog in a series for the\u00a0<\/i>National Summit on K-12 Competency-Based Education<\/i><\/a>. We are focusing on four key areas: equity, quality, meeting students where they are, and policy. (Learn more about the Summit\u00a0<\/i>here<\/i><\/a>.) We released a series of draft papers in early June to begin addressing these issues. This article is adapted from\u00a0<\/i>In Search of Efficacy: Defining the Elements of Quality in a Competency-Based Education System<\/a>.\u00a0It is important to remember that all of these ideas can be further developed, revised, or combined \u2013 the papers are only a starting point for introducing these key issues and driving discussions at the Summit. We would love to hear your comments on which ideas are strong, which are wrong, and how we might be able to advance the field.\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n In this article, we describe the nine domains of a competency-based structure (remember: this is a draft and we want ideas about what is missing and what shouldn\u2019t belong) and key questions that could open the door to discussions about quality. In the\u00a0paper<\/a>, you can also find exemplars and \u2018look-fors\u2019\u00a0\u2013\u00a0and we want to collect the best examples we can find over the next month.<\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n Description of Structures \u2013 Beliefs, Policies, Operational Processes<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n One of the most powerful leverage points that states, districts, and schools have to transform their schools is the opportunity to expand expectation of student success. Success in college and careers takes much more than comprehension of the core academic subjects. Students need to become self-directed, lifelong learners with critical thinking and problem-solving skills to address challenges and take advantage of opportunities. They will also need skills such as communication, collaboration, and cultural competence to help them work in ever-changing, diverse workplaces. In order for students to develop these skills, they need to be actively learning, with opportunities to apply their skills in new contexts.<\/p>\n Key Questions to Ask in Self-Assessment or District\/School Reviews<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/a> When students advance upon mastery, not time, educators can direct their efforts to where students need the most help and make sure they learn the skills they will need in more advanced courses. This is one of the ways that competency-based education will contribute to greater equity. The features of advancing upon mastery are based upon research on motivation, engagement, and learning. Students are more engaged and motivated when grading is seen as feedback that helps them show what they know and focuses on what they need to work on rather than judgment. Students may spend more time working in those areas that are more difficult for them. They may even advance beyond grade level in some domains, while taking more time in those that are more challenging.<\/p>\n There are several features of the \u201cmove on when ready\u201d policy to advance upon mastery, all of which need to be taken into consideration:<\/p>\n Beliefs, policies, and processes organized around student advancement based on demonstration of mastery include: multiple opportunities to demonstrate learning, targeted and timely instruction, coaching that supports students as they strive for the next level of mastery, and transparent feedback and grading practices that inform on pace and progress in reaching mastery. Districts and schools need to ensure that evidence-gathering against each well-designed learning outcome is valid and reliable, as this influences the degree to which students have mastered the content\/skill before advancing and ensures that monitoring structures are designed for providing high quality education.<\/p>\n Key Questions to Ask in Self-Assessment or School Reviews<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/a> Transparency of district-wide or school-wide learning objectives and student progress toward those objectives is one of the high leverage aspects of competency-based education. Although transparency does not automatically result in greater student agency, it is required for fostering greater ownership by students over their education, and providing opportunity for choice in how they learn and how they demonstrate their learning. In a quality competency-based structure, students receive feedback (scores or grades) that helps them understand how they are progressing toward the learning objectives. Teachers collaborate frequently and with intentionality about what they want students to know and be able to do. Working together, they improve instruction and assessment literacy, and build deeper understanding of learning progressions. They also monitor the outcomes and experiences of subgroups of students so they can share responsibility for eliminating disproportionality in outcomes. In addition, family and community support can be marshaled around attainment of learning targets.<\/p>\n Key Questions to Ask in Self-Assessment or School Reviews<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/a> Competency-based education makes the desired learning clear to the student, enabling the student, family, and community to know, in advance, what is expected and to apply the effort necessary to demonstrate the expected learning and habits. In other words, competency-based education is designed to empower students and educators. Students are supported in building sufficient skills and a framework of knowledge to take responsibility for their education and become lifelong learners. Educators are empowered to collaborate in responding to the changing needs of students so that all students are making progress.<\/p>\n Non-negotiables:<\/p>\n Key Questions to Ask in Self-Assessment or School Reviews<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/a> Policies, operations, and deployment of resources designed to be responsive to student learning\u00a0need to provide timely, differentiated instructional and other necessary supports. Every student struggles at one point or another. To keep engagement high and quickly address misconceptions before they become rooted in a student\u2019s understanding, competency-based schools provide flex time during the day for students to receive additional instructional support. When students don\u2019t complete a course within the semester, they continue to focus on the specific skills they need to develop as they move to the next semester or through additional time after school or in the summer. What they do not need to do is retake an entire course. Districts and schools are organized to be responsive to student progress with flexibility to provide the necessary support, including creating additional time for learning.<\/p>\n Non-negotiables:<\/p>\n Key Questions to Ask in Self-Assessment or School Reviews<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/a> A quality CBE system relies upon the consistency and reliability of the evidence used to inform, develop, and ultimately demonstrate learner competencies. In competency education, educators take responsibility for ensuring all students are learning, progressing, and have a plan to reach graduation and college\/career readiness. For example, a policy to eliminate the option to pass students on with Cs and Ds and replace it with the concept of \u201cNot Yet\u201d supports internal accountability necessary to develop quality within a competency-based structure. In turn, this policy requires processes that ensure consistency (in expectations), reliability (in assessing student learning and in growth rates), and continuous improvement (for students, adults, and the entire organizational performance). Accompanying these policies and processes is the belief that all students can demonstrate proficiency and achieve high expectations.<\/p>\n Elements of this domain within a quality competency-based structures should include:<\/p>\n Key Questions to Ask in Self-Assessment or School Reviews<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/a> Continuous improvement is a critical element of competency-based education. When districts and schools take responsibility for ensuring every student is successful in their learning, they will need to be engaged in constant efforts to respond to students (in the short run) and improve school performance (in the long run).<\/p>\n Information management systems need to be designed to allow district and school leadership to monitor student progress, identify when teachers need additional support or have strengths that can be further utilized, and monitor effectiveness of processes. This requires that information management systems are built to follow a student over the K-12 continuum rather than adhere to a course-by-course basis, thereby allowing growth and pace to be monitored and measured more incrementally. This system should allow for monitoring student progress over the course of a year, not just measured in the typical nine month school year. Data dashboards, if used, can provide insights on level of proficiency, progress, individual student growth, and depth of knowledge.<\/p>\n Key Questions to Ask in Self-Assessment or School Reviews<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/a> Just like their students, teachers are supported in their own learning through transparent measures of mastery, ongoing feedback, and access to evidence-based, professional learning that is responsive to their areas of growth. They have access to data that provides helpful feedback on their strengths and opportunities for growth. They are familiar with the learning sciences and apply it to their learning as we all instructional design and support for students.<\/p>\n Effective competency-based structures have policies, processes, and beliefs that support this structural domain. Non-negotiables include:<\/p>\n Key Questions to Ask in Self-Assessment or School Reviews<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n Description of Structures \u2013 Beliefs, Policies, Operational Processes<\/i><\/strong><\/p>\n Adaptive or distributed management strategies are deployed to create an empowering learning organization. Leadership sets the tone regarding seeing mistakes as an opportunity to learn rather than one for blaming. Structures and protocols are used to support inclusive decision-making. One of the principal\u2019s most important leadership functions is to support PLCs, making sure they have the time to meet and are staying true to the norms that allow them to be a source of collaborative, professional development.<\/p>\n Key Questions to Ask in Self-Assessment or School Reviews<\/i><\/p>\n This post first appeared on CompetencyWorks on June 14, 2017. This is the ninth blog in a…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"issue":[396,368],"location":[],"class_list":["post-2287","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","issue-how-to-get-started","issue-issues-in-practice"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nWhat Is The\u00a0Work?<\/h3>\n
Structural Domain 1. Mission-Driven Districts and Schools Dedicated to Preparing Each and Every Student for Life, College, and Careers<\/h5>\n
\n
What Is The Strategy Or\u00a0Theory\u00a0<\/span>Of Change?<\/h3>\n
Structural Domain 2. Students Advance Based on Demonstration of Mastery<\/h5>\n
\nDescription of Structures \u2013 Beliefs, Policies, Operational Processes<\/strong><\/i><\/p>\n\n
\n
Structural Domain 3. Continuum of Learning Objectives, Student Performance, Growth, and Progress are Transparent<\/h5>\n
\nDescription of Structures \u2013 Beliefs, Policies, Operational Processes<\/strong><\/i><\/p>\n\n
Structural Domain 4. District and School Organization Empowers Students and Educators<\/h5>\n
\nDescription of Structures \u2013 Beliefs, Policies, Operational Processes<\/strong><\/i><\/p>\n\n
\n
Structural Domain 5. Schools have Autonomy and Flexibility to Provide Timely, Differentiated Support to Students<\/h5>\n
\nDescription of Structures \u2013 Beliefs, Policies, Operational Processes<\/strong><\/i><\/p>\n\n
\n
How Is Effectiveness Optimized?<\/h3>\n
Structural Domain 6. Internal Accountability Ensures Consistency and Reliability<\/h5>\n
\nDescription of Structures \u2013 Beliefs, Policies, Operational Processes<\/strong><\/i><\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
Structural Domain 7. Continuous Improvement is Driven by Metrics on Pace, Progress, and Growth<\/h5>\n
\nDescription of Structures \u2013 Beliefs, Policies, Operational Processes<\/strong><\/i><\/p>\n\n
Structural Domain 8. Teachers are Supported in Evidence-Based Professional Learning<\/h5>\n
\nDescription of Structures \u2013 Beliefs, Policies, Operational Processes<\/strong><\/i><\/p>\n\n
\n
How Is The Organization\u00a0Of The District And School\u00a0Designed To Support\u00a0This\u00a0Work?<\/h3>\n
<\/a>
\n<\/strong>Structural Domain 9. Adaptive Leadership and Empowering Management<\/h5>\n\n
Follow this blog series:<\/h5>\n
Equity<\/h5>\n
\n
Quality<\/h5>\n
\n
Learn more:<\/h5>\n
\n