{"id":2331,"date":"2017-09-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-09-08T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/blog\/meeting-students-where-they-are-navigating-system-constraints\/"},"modified":"2019-12-16T12:55:51","modified_gmt":"2019-12-16T17:55:51","slug":"meeting-students-where-they-are-navigating-system-constraints","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aurora-institute.org\/blog\/meeting-students-where-they-are-navigating-system-constraints\/","title":{"rendered":"Meeting Students Where They Are: Navigating System Constraints?"},"content":{"rendered":"

This post first appeared on CompetencyWorks<\/a> on June 18, 2017.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

This is the fifteenth blog in a series for the\u00a0<\/i>National Summit on K-12 Competency-Based Education<\/i><\/a>. We are focusing on four key areas: equity, quality, meeting students where they are, and policy. (Learn more about the Summit\u00a0<\/i>here<\/i><\/a>.) We released a series of draft papers in early June to begin addressing these issues. This article is adapted from\u00a0<\/i>In Search of Efficacy: Defining the Elements of Quality in a Competency-Based Education System<\/a>.\u00a0It is important to remember that all of these ideas can be further developed, revised, or combined \u2013 the papers are only a starting point for introducing these key issues and driving discussions at the Summit. We would love to hear your comments on which ideas are strong, which are wrong, and how we might be able to advance the field.\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n

Meeting students where they are is a structural challenge and will involve the work of reimagining and redesigning our school models around the needs of the individual, rather than the efficiency of the system. There is something of an\u00a0accountability paradox<\/a>\u00a0at play in our educational system; namely, that the very accountability system that led to much greater transparency about the performance of the education system and its inequity is also holding the traditional system that produces inequity in place. Despite this, there are five critical, interlocking structures that will enable school models to become more effectively oriented around learner needs and outcomes rather than around operational efficiencies (without entirely ignoring the need for efficiencies in the system in order to respond to systemic constraints):<\/p>\n